Alexandria, stop the nuclear TAR welcomes the use of
Sensational twist in the dispute between environmentalists and government (national and regional) regarding the installation nuclear of Bosco Marengo , near Alexandria , whose second dismantling environmentalists would become a dangerous radioactive waste dump: May 21 The Tar Piedmont upheld the appeal by several local associations, blocking in fact the procedure laid down by the government. "From Alexandria - says Lino leaps of " Democratic Medicine ", a spokesman for the environmental initiative - get a big win, bodes well in the battle against nuclear power in Italy. "
The order of the Tar Piedmont, which suspended the dismantling of the (former makings Nuclear ), according to environmentalists' set a precedent for national
all nuclear sites: in fact the same government had openly declared that in case of final decision in favor of our application, the entire strategy adopted so far would be reviewed in relation to all nuclear facilities present in Italian territory. "
Following the appeal by " Democratic Medicine , Legambiente , Pro Natura and other assciazioni, the Regional Administrative Court has ruled that an order against the Ministry of Economic Development and Ispra, Institute for the Protection and Environmental Research, inquiries concerning to Sogin (Nuclear Management Company). This ruling, the Tar accepts the request supervision and suspends execution of decommissioning, since "the circumstances relied on by the appellants to prove the existence of serious and irreparable damage resulting from the contested measure.
The Battle of Alexandria against nuclear was held "the indifference of the mayors of the province and the opposition of the same Piedmont Region , said Balza, but was won "thanks to an enthusiastic popular subscription." According to environmentalists, now comforted by the Tar, the demolition of the nuclear fuel of Bosco Marengo implicitly created a repository of radioactive waste, called "temporary" but in fact permanent, "in a totally inappropriate site, that is unsafe ' , in defiance of the provisions of 2003 that require accommodation in the safety of radioactive deposits, after first preparing an assessment of environmental impact.
